The crisis of modelling

Dear [colleague]

Are you familiar with the attached. I think there’s a connection with the article on modelling that you sent me. I believe we can present Space Syntax as addressing the “crisis of modelling”, in which:

–    traditional modelling makes dire predictions about the impact on vehicles of public realm-/public transport-oriented projects are unfounded

–    traditional modelling is cumbersome, time-consuming and expensive

–    traditional modelling seems overly focused on narrow issues such as gross vehicle movement and less aware of “real” issues such as community severance and economic performance. Continue reading The crisis of modelling

Architecture at the edge of knowledge; space syntax at the heart of design


Let me begin at the end with a summary of my presentation. The space syntax approach is more than a computer programme. The beauty – and I think it is a beauty – of the approach is that it combines three key aspects of practice: the first two have been dealt with in depth by Bill Hillier in his presentation and these are architectural theory and computer technology. The third is design experience. In a wide range of design sectors and across all scales, from individual building layouts to entire cities and city regions, over twenty years of practice have demonstrated that space syntax offers architects, like myself, an edge. Whether we see this as an edge over our fellow architects, an edge over the unsustainable processes that have emerged to stifle communications between architects and non-architects or an edge over the unexpected events that shape everyday life, space syntax provides an edge. Continue reading Architecture at the edge of knowledge; space syntax at the heart of design